Sunday 7 September 2008

An Taisce cold water on Dun Laoghaire baths plan

A controversial proposal to redevelop part of the south Dublin coastline including the site of the Dún Laoghaire baths has been condemned by An Taisce.

The plans, by Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown council, could damage the environment and threaten the existence of wildlife in the area, the heritage group says. Two new concepts designed by consultants on behalf of the council were priced at €129m and €92m when they were unveiled earlier this year.

The more expensive "Concept A" involves a lagoon beach and a pedestrian bridge adjacent to the East Pier. An aquatic play area is intended for the old public baths site, alongside a civic space. It includes an underground car park.

"Concept B" involves a new promenade and sandy beach from the East Pier to the Newtownsmith section. It also includes a new water sports centre in Sandycove Park.

An Taisce noted the area between the East Pier and Sandycove forms part of the Dalkey Coast and Killiney Hill proposed Natural Heritage Area. It is of national conservation interest for both built and ecological heritage, the group says.

"Both Concepts A and B include significant modification and additions to coastal zone and existing artificial structures which will adversely affect the marine environment including the creation of new beaches and the construction of a breakwaters," the submission states.

"These proposals have the potential to result in direct loss of marine habitats and species, disturbance/damage to habitats and species from sedimentation and pollution during construction, and long-term changes to the hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes of the local area."

An Taisce said Concept B, which includes the conversion of the derelict baths complex to a "baths plaza", comprising of new shops and cafes, would "reduce the total recreational/amenity area which could be made available to the general public".

The Save Our Seafront Group, which spearheaded a successful campaign against the redevelopment of the baths three years ago, has now put forward its own more modest and inexpensive proposal for the scheme.

"The SOS proposal would be relatively low in cost and realistic in that it reflects local people's wishes, rather than the flights of fancy of private consultants," said chairman Richard Boyd Barrett.

Sunday Tribune

www.buckplanning.ie

No comments: