Government publishes new housing plan 300,000 homes to be delivered during lifetime of the plan

On 18 November, the Government published its new housing plan-Delivering Homes, Building Communities: An Action Plan on Housing Supply and Targeting Homelessness, 2025-20302. 

The launch took at place at the Donore Project in Dublin where over 500 new social and affordable homes are under construction.

Building on the foundations of Housing for All, with 137,000 homes built since the beginning of 2021, and informed by the work of the Housing Commission, the new plan will empower the State, partners and the private sector to further play a critical part in delivery.

Key elements of the plan:

- 300,000 homes to be delivered during lifetime of the plan.

- it is backed by unprecedented investment in water, energy and transport infrastructure, as well as regulatory reform, zoning and tax measures.

- record state investment to deliver 90,000 affordable supports, 72,000 social homes, and target homelessness.

- over €9 billion capital funding for housing in 2026 alone.

Article provided by BPS Planning Consultants

Brent geese put paid to 580 new apartments near St Anne’s Park in Dublin

 Concerns for the fate of the Light Bellied Brent Goose has helped put paid to plans for a 580 unit apartment scheme for a site near St Anne’s Park in Raheny, Dublin. This follows An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP) refusing planning permission to Patrick Crean’s Marlet Group in long-running battle over plans for the site. The decision by ACP upholds a refusal issued by Dublin City Council in October 2022 and the case was before ACP on appeal by Marlet Group subsidiary, Raheny 3 Ltd Partnership. In the appeal, planning consultants for Marlet, Brady Shipman Martin contended that the single reason for refusal over the Light Bellied Brent Goose for the scheme on lands to the east of St Paul’s College at Sybil Hill, Raheny, Dublin 5 “does not hold up”.

Read the full article @ The Irish Times

Article uploaded by BPS Planning Consultants

How can the distrust between public planners and private planners in Ireland be addressed?

 This week's Autumn Irish Planning Institute conference was an interesting event. Public and private sector planners find themselves together discussing the development management process for which both are critical actors. They have each enjoyed much the same education and may have been in the same class in college. There is in fact almost no difference between them. The only difference is that some are paid by the state and the private sector others by clients (some of which are public sector clients).

Some public sector planners appreciate private sector planners are under pressure, work hard, and do their best to deliver projects for them to review. They understand that private sector planners have clients for whom they must make the best case they can and that, as with legal defence teams, every client deserves representation. 

Others, however, are suspicious of all contact with private sector planners. Over recent years, the Irish Planning Institute has had a private sector Senior Planner as President. I hope this has shown that private sector planners are important members of the profession. I fear however that many private sector planners experience interactions with public sector planners whereby they are viewed as always trying to court favour - even when saying hello with a coffee cup in hand. This is not the case. It is a failing of our planning system that public sector planners often feel the need to retain a fire wall between themselves and private sector colleagues.

In other countries which maintain similar planning systems, the assessment of some planning applications is often tendered out to private firms, individual private planners may be contracted for short or long periods, etc. Planners can be both private and public workers. Indeed, one of the features of An Bord Pleanála (now "the Commission") some years ago was that it offered qualified and experienced planners work on a 'fee per case' basis. However, most of this work went to private planners who had considerable public sector work experience (for example,  lecturer taking on some 'on the side' work), as though private sector work experience was of a lower quality, less deserving, or somehow tainted.

One of the issues in Ireland that is causing problems with delivery is insufficient numbers of public sector planners, yet there are also shortfalls in the numbers of private sector planners. Delivery on national, regional, and local planning objectives requires both kinds. There is a growing need for planners to be able to move in and out of the public and private sectors  to fill given roles for given periods. However, while it is not difficult to move from private sector to public sector in the early years of a given career, i.e. after graduating from a planning qualification, usually someone in their 20s, this becomes more and more difficult. Private planners with significant capacity to help Ireland deliver projects - the very ones with the experience often lacking in the public sector - find it hard to move into senior roles in the public sector. A Senior Planner in a private firm seldom, if ever, moves into a Senior Planner role in a local authority. I am open to receiving an email confirming one case where this has taken place in circumstances where the private planner had no previous public sector experience (but 20 -30 years of private experience).

Roles in the public sector should not be subjected to gate keeping requirements of a minimum number of years in the public sector. Eminently qualified and experienced, high performance, private sector planners turn up to interviews for public sector roles to be asked why they have not worked in the public sector at all or for more years. This is as though the skills of a private sector planner are somehow less than those of a public sector planner (who may have never prepared and lodged a planning application, but has only ever worked on the manicured and packaged planning applications prepared by the private sector to meet the many requirements of validation and so on). 

Specialist planning barristers have normally never worked as a planning officer or inspector yet their opinions and views on planning are widely respected. Why is there less respect for private planners who often in fact have more experience and knowledge of Irish planning than such barristers?

There are many reasons for this, but, in the end, it comes down to distrust. The distrust between public planning officials and private sector planners often stems from differing incentives, perceived biases, and systemic issues in the planning process. While there’s no comprehensive study specifically addressing this dynamic in Ireland, insights from planning practices, stakeholder interactions, and related commentary provide a clear picture. Below, I outline the key reasons for this distrust, focusing on the Irish context where possible, and drawing on broader planning dynamics.

Public planning officials are tasked with safeguarding the public interest, balancing development with environmental, social, and community needs under frameworks like the Planning and Development Act 2000. Private sector planners, employed by developers or consultancies, prioritise their clients’ interests—often securing approvals for projects. This creates a perception among public officials that private planners may cherry-pick data or present overly optimistic assessments to favour project approval. I have heard a public sector planners tell stories of how private sector planners are "wrong" in, for example, a section 5 application covering letter. They fail to see that the job of the private planner is to argue a client's case to the best of their ability. One would not expect a criminal defence team to set out both sides of the case. That a planner can set out both sides of the case is obvious, but, again, many public sector planners consider submissions from private planners to represent their personal opinion. Does every public sector planner consider every recommendation they have made in their career to align with their own opinion? No. Of course not. Both are working as planners for their respective employers.

Some public sector planners clearly believe that certain clients do not deserve representation. Further, I have been criticised in the past for representing given clients, yet criminal barristers working defence take on clients who are often later judged to have carried out heinous crimes. Has any Irish private planner ever represented a client of any equivalence to this? Should private planners be able ethically to turn down any client they dislike? Do prosecution teams dislike defence teams merely because of the clients they represent? Ethnically, both public and private planners must reasonably work on any planning case they are presented with. How many public sector planners have ever refused to assess a given planning application? Other than for reasons of conflict of interest, I am not sure there are any such cases.

Public officials often deal with planning applications of varying quality from private planners, which public officials may attribute to private planners cutting corners to meet client deadlines or budgets. In reality private sector planners can only present details and drawings provided to them by a client and their project team. Not every planning application can be gold plated. Not every project will be financed in a manner which allows the very best experts, architects, etc. to be involved. Further, not every private planning firm is the same; not all have the resources of the larger firms. Private planners are left to make their case with what they have. It is the role of the public sector planner to decide if this is or is not sufficient. It should not reflect well or badly on the private planner who is only doing their job.

Private planners often work under pressure to deliver outcomes for developers, which can lead to lobbying or attempts to influence planning decisions by those developers. Public planners, aware of this, often see the private sector planner on the team as being one and the same with the client developer. This is not the case. Private planners are tools being used by clients. They are consultants. That a project appears in a newspaper does not mean a private planner put if there or agrees - on a personal level - with that article.

I have had conversations with public sector planners where they have highlight concerns about developers exploiting regulatory gaps, yet the fact that these gaps often exist is not the fault of any Irish private planner. I have called for up to date wind and solar planning guidelines for some time yet they remain out of date or non-existent. Private planners are left to fill the gaps. Public planners see developers as enabled by private planners’ advocacy yet how else can many projects proceed in the absence of any guidance? This dynamic can create an adversarial relationship, with public planners viewing their private counterparts as prioritising profit over public good. Yet, again, private planners are normally working on a consultancy basis only to manage an increasingly complicated planning system.

Community consultation is critical in Irish planning, especially for contentious projects like wind farms. Public officials often find that private planners’ engagement with locals is superficial, designed to “tick boxes” rather than address concerns like visual blight or property impacts. At the same time, public sector planners may receive hundreds of objections to a planning application and still grant planning permission. Both public and private planners know when there are and are not genuine third party concerns arising.

Historically, planning in Ireland has seen public officials as gatekeepers of regulatory integrity, while private planners are seen as external actors with less accountability to long-term public outcomes. This divide is exacerbated when private planners, often better resourced, produce detailed but selectively framed reports that overwhelm understaffed public planning departments. While I sympathise with public sector planners that the scale of many planning applications are almost overwhelming, it is necessary to remember that these applications are normally prepared and presented by private sector planners who are just as overwhelmed but are constantly faced with validation issues, criticisms that some point has not received sufficient attention, etc. The fact is that both public and private planners are impacted by the growing complexity of planning applications in this country. I invite a public sector planner to try preparing a substitute consent planning application at this time. The guidance and the regulatory framework has constantly changed in recent years and continues to change.

Private planners’ submissions often lead to appeals or judicial reviews when rejected, as developers challenge public decisions. The high rate of appeals to An Coimisiún Pleanála, particularly for renewable projects, suggests public officials face pressure to make defensible decisions against well-funded private challenges. This adversarial process breeds distrust, as public officials perceive private planners as enabling litigation rather than fostering collaborative solutions. This is, in the end, the planning process. As with the courts, of course a decision made by a local authority to refuse a large planning application is likely to be appealed, as would a significant case first heard in the lower courts. It is merely a matter of process. It is however worth noting that private planners likely have far more experience in the totality of the planning process.

To address this, Ireland could:

Define the role of "planner" in legislation: This would, as with the term "architect" make clear that this is a protected and understood role and profession. This would make the skills and experience of a planner the focus and not years of local authority or public service.

Alter job description requirements: Local authorities and the Commission could alter the requirements applicable to job applicants to accept years as a private planner as equivalent to those as a public planner.

Revise the Development Management Guidelines: Revised guidelines could set out the roles of public and private sector planners in the development management process.

Training and Resources: There is a need to address the perception that exists around public and private sector planning experience being different when it is one and the same. Private sector planners seeking to enter the public sector should not be disadvantaged by perceptions.

In conclusion, work is needed to ensure that Irish planners - public and private - are deemed to both play critical roles in Irish planning. A planners skillset and experience should qualify him or her for any planning role if they are deemed suitable. There should be no gate keeping arising from 'years on the job' type recruitment in the public sector. We need the best planners to work hard delivering a critical service for this country. A decision to work in the private or public sector for part of a career should not prejudice whether one can then move into or out of public or private sector roles to suit the country's needs. The issues outlined above are all ones of perception. Irish Planning Institute conferences are for planners - the public/private divide is imagined. If I required surgery, I would want the best surgeon to operate regardless of whether they were primarily a private or a public sector surgeon.

Article compiled by BPS Planning & Development Consultants

Ireland needs updated wind farm planning application assessment guidance

 Following on from the previous article on the need for guidance assessing solar farm planning applications, it is necessary to point out - as noted at this week's Irish Planning Institute Autumn conference - that we we also need updated guidelines on wind farm development and on assessing such planning applications.

The current Wind Energy Development Guidelines, issued in 2006, are outdated and no longer fully address the evolving technological, environmental, community, and policy landscapes. Despite ongoing reviews since 2013 and draft revisions in 2019, final updated guidelines have not been published as of October 2025, missing multiple timelines including Q1 2025 set in the Climate Action Plan 2024. This delay exacerbates inconsistencies in planning decisions, hinders renewable energy targets, and fails to mitigate key concerns.

Below, I outline the primary reasons for this need, drawing on recent developments and stakeholder input.

Wind turbine technology has advanced significantly since 2006, with modern turbines often exceeding 150-200 meters in height—far taller than those envisioned in the original guidelines. The 2006 guidelines do not adequately account for these changes, leading to inadequate provisions on setback distances, noise limits, and shadow flicker. For example, permitted noise levels in Ireland are reportedly double those in Australia, prompting calls for stricter standards to protect residential amenities. The ongoing review aims to address these, but without finalized updates, planning authorities rely on ad-hoc interpretations, resulting in variable outcomes and increased appeals to An Coimisiún Pleanála (formerly An Bord Pleanála).

The absence of updated guidance contributes to fragmented decision-making across local authorities. In Q2 2025, only two wind farms (79 MW) were approved, while 76 MW were rejected and over 1,600 MW awaited decisions, highlighting inefficiencies. New regulations like the European Union (Planning and Development) (Renewable Energy) Regulations 2025 introduce mandatory timelines and scoping for Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) starting October 2025, but these are procedural and do not provide substantive criteria for assessments. Updated guidelines would standardize evaluations on site suitability, grid integration, and cumulative impacts, aligning with the Accelerating Renewable Electricity Taskforce (ARET) priorities for 2025/2026, which include issuing final guidelines to boost onshore wind deployment.

Wind farms can impact biodiversity, habitats, and scenic landscapes, particularly in sensitive areas like Natura 2000 sites. The 2006 guidelines lack robust requirements for modern environmental safeguards, such as detailed biodiversity net gain assessments or mitigation for bird and bat collisions. With Ireland targeting 9 GW of onshore wind by 2030 under the Climate Action Plan, updated guidance is essential to balance renewable goals with ecological protection. The review process emphasizes these aspects, but delays mean projects proceed under insufficient frameworks, risking legal challenges and environmental harm.

Community opposition has grown due to perceived over-saturation in rural areas, visual impacts, and inadequate consultation. Protests in 2024 called for "robust" new regulations, with the Taoiseach acknowledging outdated rules and the need for greater setbacks from homes. The draft 2019 revisions proposed enhanced community obligations, dividends, and early engagement, but without implementation, trust erodes. Updated guidelines could mandate benefit-sharing models and address "over-saturation" to foster acceptance, as recommended by Wind Energy Ireland and parliamentary questions.

Uncertainty deters investment, with developers facing unpredictable risks amid grid constraints and policy shifts. The National Planning Framework revision and the Planning and Development Act 2024 necessitate aligned guidelines to support Ireland's EU renewable targets and avoid penalties. Studies like "Protecting Consumers – Our Onshore Wind Energy Opportunity" highlight the potential for more onshore wind but stress the need for clear, updated planning frameworks to realize it.

The Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, in collaboration with the Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications, continues the review, with public consultation on drafts anticipated before finalization. Until updated guidelines are issued—potentially as a National Planning Statement under new legislation—planning assessments remain inconsistent and suboptimal. Prioritizing this would accelerate wind farm development toward 2030 goals while addressing stakeholder concerns, ensuring sustainable growth in renewable energy.

Article compiled by BPS Planning & Development Consultants

The growing need for guidelines for planners assessing solar farm planning applications

 Attending the Irish Planning Institute conference this week, I found myself listening to a Minister and an official who talked about blockages to delivery of projects of various kinds. 

One area where the government could address blockages is in providing guidelines for the proper assessment of various development types. For example, at present, solar utility development planning applications, commonly referred to as solar farms, are growing in number yet there is no statutory guidance available at all to Irish planning officials as regards the proper assessment of such proposals.

Ireland Needs Statutory Guidelines for Assessing Solar Farm Development Planning Applications. If one wants to understand why judicial reviews arise, it is due in many cases to failure to advise local communities in advance that such developments are even possible in their area(s). Development Plans do not indicate where such development is appropriate. Unzoned open fields suddenly become the site of large-scale proposals in a manner which is not plan-led. It is somewhat of a wild west or a gold rush with lands not previously ever deemed suitable for intensive development(s) now suddenly seemingly available in any rural area for these schemes. Every field in Ireland seems now rezoned for solar development. Is this the correct approach or should some fields be deemed more appropriate than others? Should some areas be wholly excluded? Should people purchasing homes in rural areas have the right to know in advance that a solar farm proposal may arrive at any time in lands surrounding their future home?

Ireland is at a critical juncture in its transition to renewable energy. With ambitious targets set under the Climate Action Plan to achieve 8GW of solar capacity by 2030, solar farms are increasingly seen as a vital component of the nation's energy mix. However, the rapid expansion of these projects has exposed significant gaps in the planning system. As of July 2025, there are still no specific planning guidelines for solar energy developments, leaving applications to be assessed on a case-by-case basis under the general provisions of the Planning and Development Act 2000. This absence of statutory guidelines leads to inconsistencies, delays, and conflicts that hinder progress toward net-zero goals while failing to adequately address environmental, community, and economic concerns. Below, I explore the key reasons why Ireland urgently needs dedicated statutory guidelines for solar farm planning applications.

Without standardised guidelines, planning authorities across Ireland apply varying criteria to solar farm applications, resulting in unpredictable outcomes. What might be approved in one county could be rejected in another due to differing interpretations of environmental impact, land use suitability, or visual amenity. For instance, the Irish Solar Energy Association (ISEA) has long highlighted the lack of national policies for solar PV on agricultural land, where decisions often hinge on subjective visual assessments or local development plans. This inconsistency not only prolongs the approval process but also increases costs for developers, who must navigate a maze of local preferences and appeals to An Bord Pleanála (now An Coimisiún Pleanála).

Recent updates, such as the European Union (Planning and Development) (Renewable Energy) Regulations 2025, introduce mandatory timelines for decisions—52 weeks for large-scale projects over 150kW and shorter periods for smaller ones—but these focus on procedural speed rather than substantive assessment criteria. Statutory guidelines would provide clear, uniform standards for site selection, such as prioritizing brownfield or low-grade agricultural land, thereby reducing appeals and accelerating deployment to meet EU renewable targets and avoid potential fines.

Solar farms, while low-carbon, can have substantial environmental footprints if not properly managed. Issues like habitat disruption, soil erosion, biodiversity loss, and flood risks from altered water runoff are common concerns. In Ireland's lush countryside, large arrays of panels can transform scenic landscapes, leading to opposition over visual blight. The SEAI's community toolkit notes that landscape and visual impacts, along with glint and glare effects on nearby roads or homes, are frequent reasons for refusal, particularly in sensitive areas near Natura 2000 sites.

Guidelines would likely mandate comprehensive assessments, such as Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) scoping and promote best practices like agrivoltaics, where panels coexist with grazing or crop production to minimize land loss. Without these, poorly sited projects risk ecological harm, undermining the very sustainability goals solar energy aims to support.

Local communities frequently bear the brunt of solar farm developments, with worries about property devaluation, noise during construction, and changes to rural character fueling resistance. Dail discussions have highlighted concentrations of farms in areas like Cork due to grid availability, potentially "blighting" landscapes and affecting residents' quality of life. Early engagement is recommended, but without statutory mandates, consultations can be superficial or absent.

Statutory guidelines would enforce transparent community involvement, including benefit funds and mitigation strategies, as seen in wind energy codes of practice. This structured approach could build trust, reduce objections, and ensure equitable distribution of renewable benefits, fostering broader social acceptance essential for scaling up solar installation

Ireland's reliance on agriculture amplifies concerns over converting farmland to solar use. Deputies have raised alarms about losing arable land amid global food security challenges, with solar farms sometimes spanning hundreds of acres. The ISEA advocates for dual-use models, like sheep grazing under panels, but without guidelines, prime farmland is vulnerable to permanent change.

Dedicated guidelines could define land eligibility criteria, encouraging development on marginal soils while protecting high-value agricultural areas. This balance is crucial, as Ireland's solar surge—reaching 1.7GW installed by mid-2025—must not compromise food production.

The regulatory void creates uncertainty for investors, who face unpredictable planning risks and grid connection delays. While the 2025 regulations presume renewable projects serve the "overriding public interest," the lack of detailed assessment frameworks discourages funding. Clear guidelines on timelines, grid integration, and decommissioning would provide the stability needed to attract capital and achieve the 8GW target.

Grid constraints often cluster developments in certain regions, exacerbating local impacts. Guidelines could integrate spatial planning with grid capacity, optimizing locations and incorporating storage solutions.

Ireland's commitment to renewables is commendable, but the absence of statutory guidelines for solar farms risks derailing progress. As the Department scopes potential guidelines under the 2025 Programme for Government, swift action is essential to create a balanced, efficient framework. By addressing inconsistencies, protecting environments and communities, and boosting investment, such guidelines would ensure solar energy contributes effectively to a greener future without unnecessary conflicts.

Article compiled by BPS Planning & Development Consultants

‘Better quality’ planning decisions would mean fewer judicial reviews - Bar council chair

 The chair of the Bar council has hit back at criticism of rising numbers of planning judicial reviews, saying “better quality” decision-making by planning authorities would mean fewer reviews. Seán Guerin SC said the courts must apply the law and our laws, made by the people’s representatives, include some regulations imposing higher standards than those required under EU law. He was speaking amid claims by politicians, including Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Uisce Éireann, developers and others, that rising numbers of judicial reviews were contributing to delays in housing and other development. Some rules, whether they are based on European or domestic law, were very important for citizens, he said.

Read the full article @ The Irish Times

Article uploaded by BPS Planning & Development Consultants

Impending changes in planning laws ‘more important’ than budget negotiations - Minister

 Changes due within weeks to the State’s planning laws to quicken the construction of large projects are “more important” than the spending talks with Cabinet ministers in advance of next week’s budget, the Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers said, addressing a British-Irish Chamber of Commerce conference. Promising the most ambitious reforms “seen for decades”, the Minister said they would result in “peeling back a lot of the guidance, the public administration which is getting in the way of delivery”. “Ultimately, for me, making the case for reform is more important than the discussion that we have about who gets what next Tuesday in terms of Budget 2026,” Mr Chambers said. Narrow interests by individuals “are blocking broader social and economic objectives”, he said, while administrative hurdles faced by State planners and councils often do not “add value and only adds time and delays”.

Read the full article @ The Irish Times

Article uploaded by BPS Planning & Development Consultants

Two consortiums will bid to build long-awaited MetroLink

 Two consortiums have confirmed they will bid to build the long-awaited MetroLink rail line, which was finally granted permission by An Coimisiún Pleanála on Thursday, three years after planning permission was sought. The 18.8km rail line, expected to cost more than €10 billion, was first proposed a quarter of a century ago and is anticipated to begin operations in the mid-2030s. Travelling mostly underground, the remote-controlled, driverless trains will run every three minutes from Swords in north Dublin to Charlemont, close to Ranelagh in South Dublin. The route will have 16 stops serving areas including Dublin Airport, Ballymun, Glasnevin, Phibsborough and the city centre. A trip from Swords to the city centre is expected to take about 25 minutes, while journeys from the airport to the city will take about 20 minutes.

Read the full article @ The Irish times 

Article uploaded by BPS Planning & Development Consultants

MetroLink project given green light by An Coimisiún Pleanála

 Permission has been granted for Dublin's long-awaited MetroLink project linking the city centre to the airport. An Coimisiún Pleanála published the Railway order this morning which gives construction for the MetroLink Project the green light. The MetroLink plan consists of a new 18.8km railway line, most of which will be underground, from Charlemont near Dublin city centre to Swords Estuary in the north of the county. The project was first mooted in the year 2000, but it was shelved during the financial crisis.

Read the full article @ www.rte.ie

Article uploaded by BPS Planning & Development Consultants

More than 85% of planning roles sought two years ago remain vacant

 Just 15 per cent of the new planners sought by city and county managers two years ago to speed up the delivery of new housing have been recruited, latest figures show. While delays in the planning process are cited by developers, builders and utilities as a big reason for the undersupply of housing, the planning departments of local authorities remain understaffed by hundreds of posts, with only slow progress in filling the vacancies. In 2023, during debates on revised planning legislation, the body that represents city and county managers said that local authorities countrywide needed 541 more planners to keep up with existing demand – and would need more to fulfil an expanded role under the new Planning and Development Act. 

Read the full article @ The Irish Times

Article uploaded by BPS Planning Consultants LTD

Sport Ireland seeks planning permission for national cricket centre

 Plans lodged by Sport Ireland for a new national cricket centre, including a spectator bowl, would generate a €93 million tourism dividend here over a five-year period, according to planning documents lodged with Fingal County Council. During the same 2026 to 2030 period, the cricket stadium, which would have a permanent capacity of 4,240, would generate an additional €29 million through ticket sales and operational expenditure. Sport Ireland is also seeking permission for a high-performance centre and supporting infrastructure at the Sport Ireland National Sports Campus at Abbotstown.

Article uploaded by BPS Planning Consultants LTD

Read the full article @ https://www.irishtimes.com/

Planning permission granted for new apartment scheme on site of Dublin’s largest synagogue

 Planning permission has been granted for a large new apartment scheme on the site of Dublin’s largest synagogue, despite concern by local residents about the scale of the plans and the loss of an iconic building. Dublin City Council approved plans by developer, Granbrind Terenure Limited, for the construction of 60 apartments on a 0.54 site on Rathfarnham Road in Terenure that currently houses an Orthodox Jewish synagogue. However, the scale of the development has been reduced by the company from its original plans for 66 apartments after serious concerns were raised by council planners. The scheme will consist of three apartment blocks ranging from three to six storeys in height. The developer claimed its plans strike a balance between minimising the impact of the development on neighbouring residents and securing a reasonable scale and density in line with national planning policy.

Article uploaded by BPS Planning & Development Consultants LTD

Read the full article @ www.independent.ie

Investigation into Bobby Sands statue erected in West Belfast without planning permission

 BELFAST CITY COUNCIL is investigating after a statue of Bobby Sands was unveiled in West Belfast without the appropriate planning permission. It was erected in a memorial garden in Sands’ area of Twinbrook to mark 44 years since the former IRA member and MP died aged 27 following a sustained hunger strike in which 9 other republicans passed away. They were protesting sweeping internment measures enacted by the British Government, led by Margaret Thatcher, during the Troubles due to terrorism concerns. The deaths of Sands and his fellow strikers caused a large increase in recruitment for the IRA, after nationalist communities largely rallied in support of the group. The unveiling of the statue on Sunday was attended by First Minister of Northern Ireland and Sinn Féin vice-president, Michelle O’Neill who described it on X as a “powerful tribute” which she says “continues to inspire people here in Ireland and across the world in pursuit of freedom and justice”.

Article uploaded by BPS Planning Consultants LTD

Read the full article @ Thejournal.ie

Will Luas ever be expanded?

 There are plans to extend the Luas light rail system in Ireland, primarily focusing on expanding Dublin's network. The most imminent project is the extension of the Green Line to Finglas. This proposed 4-kilometer extension will add four new stops beyond the current terminus at Broombridge: St. Helena's Road, Finglas Village, St. Margaret's Road, and Charlestown. The project aims to enhance connectivity for communities in north Dublin, with an expected operational date by 2031.

Beyond the Finglas extension, the Transport Strategy for the Greater Dublin Area 2022-2042 outlines several other Luas expansions slated for completion between 2031 and 2036:

• Lucan Line: A new line connecting Lucan to the city center.

• Bray Extension: Extending the Green Line southward to Bray.

• Poolbeg Extension: Extending the Red Line to serve the Poolbeg area, targeted for completion before 2042.

These planned expansions aim to improve public transport accessibility and reduce reliance on private vehicles in the Greater Dublin Area.

While there have been discussions about introducing Luas-style systems in other Irish cities, such as Cork and Galway, these proposals are still in the early stages and have not yet advanced to formal planning or construction phases.

It's important to note that infrastructure projects of this scale are subject to various factors, including funding, planning approvals, and political support, which can influence timelines and implementation.

Article written by BPS Planning Consultants LTD

Why do geographers make good planners?

Geographers are good town planner as they use statistics extensively to analyse spatial patterns, relationships, and trends in both physical and human geography. Some key ways geographers use statistics include:

1. Descriptive Statistics – Summarizing geographic data (e.g., mean temperature, population density).
2. Inferential Statistics – Making predictions or testing hypotheses (e.g., using regression analysis to study climate change effects).
3. Spatial Statistics – Analysing spatial patterns and relationships (e.g., nearest neighbour analysis, Moran’s I for spatial autocorrelation).
4. Geostatistics – Used in physical geography and environmental science (e.g., kriging for climate modelling).
5. Big Data & GIS Analysis – Combining statistical methods with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to visualize and interpret large datasets.

Here is an example of a specific statistical method in geography.

Let’s look at Moran’s I, a key spatial statistic used in geography to measure spatial autocorrelation.

Moran’s I: Measuring Spatial Patterns

Moran’s I helps geographers determine if a particular variable (e.g., population density, crime rates, temperature) is clustered, dispersed, or randomly distributed across a geographic area.

Formula:

$$I = \frac{N}{\sum W_{ij}} \times \frac{\sum W_{ij} (X_i - \bar{X}) (X_j - \bar{X})}{\sum (X_i - \bar{X})^2}$$

where:

• $N$ = total number of locations
• $X_i$ = value at location $i$
• $\bar{X}$ = mean of all values
• $W_{ij}$ = spatial weight between locations $i$ and $j$ (defines spatial relationships)
• $\sum W_{ij}$ = sum of all spatial weights

Interpreting Moran’s I:

• $I > 0$: Positive spatial autocorrelation (similar values cluster together)
• $I < 0$: Negative spatial autocorrelation (high and low values are dispersed)
• $I \approx 0$: No spatial pattern (random distribution)

Example Application:

• Crime Mapping: Detecting whether crime is concentrated in specific neighbourhoods.
• Epidemiology: Identifying hotspots for disease outbreaks.
• Urban Planning: Analysing housing price distribution in a city.

Can I now build a modular home or granny flat in my back garden without planning permission?

 As of February 2025, in Ireland, constructing a modular home in your back garden generally requires planning permission. Current regulations allow for certain exemptions: you can build a free-standing structure up to 25 square meters without planning permission, provided it's not intended for habitation. Structures meant for living purposes, such as modular homes, do not fall under this exemption and thus require planning approval.
However, new legislation is being proposed to address this issue. The government is considering changes that would allow "granny flats" or detached modular units to be built in back gardens without the need for planning permission, extending the current exemption for 40 square meter extensions to include these detached units. This proposal aims to provide additional housing options, especially for young adults living with their parents. As of now, this legislation is still under consideration and has not been enacted.
Given these developments, it's advisable to consult BPS or your local planning authority before proceeding with construction, as regulations may change. Staying informed about the latest planning laws will help ensure your project complies with current requirements.

Article written by BPS Planning Consultants LTD

Why Ireland Needs Planning Application Guidance for Solar Farms

The transition to renewable energy is a crucial step for Ireland in meeting its climate targets and reducing reliance on fossil fuels. Solar energy, in particular, has gained traction due to its sustainability and decreasing cost. However, the rapid expansion of solar farms has raised concerns about land use, environmental impact, and community integration. To ensure balanced development, Ireland must establish comprehensive planning application guidance for solar farms.

The Need for Clear Planning Regulations

Currently, Ireland lacks a standardized and detailed framework for approving solar farm projects. This regulatory gap creates uncertainties for developers, local authorities, and communities. Without clear guidance, planning decisions can be inconsistent, leading to project delays and conflicts. A well-defined policy would streamline the approval process, ensuring that solar farms align with national energy goals while minimizing negative consequences.

Environmental Considerations

Solar farms, while beneficial in reducing carbon emissions, can have significant environmental implications. Poorly planned projects may lead to habitat destruction, soil degradation, and disruption of local ecosystems. Comprehensive planning guidance would establish criteria for site selection, ensuring that projects are located on appropriate lands, such as brownfield sites or low-quality agricultural land, rather than ecologically sensitive areas.

Community Engagement and Social Acceptance

One of the primary challenges in solar farm development is gaining public support. Communities often raise concerns about landscape aesthetics, land use conflicts, and potential devaluation of property. A structured planning framework would mandate community consultations, ensuring transparency and addressing concerns through mitigation strategies. Public participation in the planning process would foster social acceptance and minimize opposition.

Grid Infrastructure and Land Use Efficiency

The integration of solar farms into Ireland’s power grid requires strategic planning. Without proper guidance, projects may be developed in locations with inadequate grid capacity, leading to inefficiencies and additional infrastructure costs. A planning framework would help optimize land use by encouraging co-location with agricultural activities (agrivoltaics) and promoting the use of dual-purpose land to maximize economic and environmental benefits.

Legal and Economic Certainty

Uncertainty in planning regulations can deter investment in the renewable energy sector. Developers require clear guidelines on land eligibility, grid access, and approval timelines to make informed financial decisions. A robust planning framework would provide legal certainty, attracting investors while ensuring that projects contribute positively to Ireland’s renewable energy targets.

Conclusion

To fully harness the potential of solar energy, Ireland must implement comprehensive planning application guidance for solar farms. A well-structured policy would facilitate sustainable development, protect the environment, engage communities, optimize grid integration, and provide legal clarity. By establishing clear regulations, Ireland can support its transition to a greener future while balancing the interests of all stakeholders.

Why Planning Applications for Data Centres Are an Issue in Ireland

In recent years, Ireland has emerged as a global hub for data centres, attracting major technology firms due to its favourable corporate tax policies, temperate climate, and strong digital infrastructure. However, planning applications for new data centres have become increasingly contentious. The surge in data centre development has raised concerns related to energy consumption, environmental impact, strain on infrastructure, and regional planning policies. This article explores the key issues surrounding data centre planning applications in Ireland and their broader implications.

Energy Consumption and Sustainability Concerns

One of the most significant challenges associated with data centres in Ireland is their enormous energy demand. Data centres require continuous power to operate servers, cooling systems, and backup facilities. According to the Commission for Regulation of Utilities (CRU), data centres accounted for approximately 14% of Ireland’s electricity consumption in 2021, with projections suggesting this figure could exceed 30% by 2030. This rising demand has sparked concerns over energy security and sustainability, particularly as Ireland strives to meet its climate commitments under the European Union’s Green Deal and national carbon reduction targets.

The heavy reliance on fossil fuels to support data centres contradicts Ireland’s renewable energy goals. While the government is investing in wind and solar power, the pace of renewable energy deployment has struggled to keep up with the growing power requirements of data centres. This has led to increased scrutiny of new planning applications, with some being denied or delayed due to their potential impact on the national grid.

Strain on Infrastructure and Public Services

Beyond energy concerns, data centres place a significant burden on Ireland’s infrastructure, particularly in Dublin, where the majority of these facilities are concentrated. The Irish electricity grid faces increasing pressure to accommodate the rapid expansion of data centres while ensuring sufficient supply for residential and industrial needs. The Electricity Supply Board (ESB) and EirGrid have warned that continued expansion without strategic planning could lead to power shortages or the need for expensive grid upgrades.

Additionally, data centres require extensive water usage for cooling purposes, exacerbating concerns over resource management. With climate change contributing to fluctuating rainfall patterns, local authorities and environmental groups have raised alarms about the sustainability of large-scale data centre projects, particularly in regions experiencing water stress.

Regional Planning and Economic Impact

The economic benefits of data centres—such as job creation, foreign direct investment, and technological advancement—are often cited by proponents of these developments. However, critics argue that the economic advantages are limited, as data centres employ relatively few people once operational. The construction phase does generate jobs, but long-term employment opportunities remain minimal compared to other sectors.

Moreover, the concentration of data centres in Dublin has led to an imbalance in regional development. While the government has encouraged decentralization by promoting data centre construction in rural areas, the necessary infrastructure—such as high-capacity electricity grids and broadband connectivity—often lags behind. This creates a paradox where urban centres bear the brunt of energy demand while rural areas struggle to attract investment due to inadequate infrastructure.

Policy Responses and Future Considerations

In response to mounting concerns, the Irish government has introduced stricter guidelines for data centre planning applications. EirGrid has implemented a moratorium on new grid connections for data centres in the Dublin area to alleviate pressure on the electricity network. Additionally, policymakers are considering imposing sustainability requirements, such as mandatory renewable energy sourcing and more efficient cooling technologies.

While these measures aim to balance economic growth with environmental responsibility, the future of data centre expansion in Ireland remains uncertain. Policymakers must navigate the complex challenge of supporting digital infrastructure development while safeguarding energy security, sustainability, and equitable regional planning.

Conclusion

The proliferation of data centres in Ireland has brought both opportunities and challenges. While these facilities contribute to Ireland’s position as a leading digital economy, their high energy consumption, environmental impact, and strain on national infrastructure have made planning applications increasingly controversial. As Ireland works toward a sustainable future, balancing the interests of technological growth and environmental responsibility will be crucial in shaping the country’s data centre policies. Effective regulatory frameworks and investment in renewable energy solutions will be essential in addressing these ongoing concerns.

How to become a town planner in Ireland

Town planning, also known as urban or regional planning, is a vital profession in Ireland that focuses on the sustainable development of towns, cities, and rural areas. Town planners play a crucial role in shaping communities by balancing economic growth, environmental protection, and social needs. If you are interested in pursuing a career as a town planner in Ireland, this guide will outline the necessary steps, qualifications, and skills required for this profession.

Educational Requirements

To become a town planner in Ireland, the first step is obtaining the relevant educational qualifications. Typically, this involves:

1. Undergraduate Degree: While a degree specifically in town planning is ideal, related fields such as geography, architecture, civil engineering, environmental science, or sociology can also provide a strong foundation.

2. Postgraduate Qualification: A master’s degree in planning is usually required for professional accreditation. Recognised programs are available at institutions such as University College Dublin (UCD), University College Cork (UCC), Queen’s University Belfast (QUB), and Technological University Dublin (TUD). These programs cover essential aspects of planning, including urban design, policy analysis, sustainable development, and transport planning.

Accreditation and Professional Membership

To practice as a town planner in Ireland, you must seek accreditation from the Irish Planning Institute (IPI). The IPI is the professional body responsible for maintaining standards in the field. Graduates from accredited planning programs can apply for IPI membership, which enhances professional credibility and career prospects.

Gaining Practical Experience

Practical experience is essential for becoming a successful town planner. Aspiring planners can gain experience through:

1. Internships and Work Placements: Many postgraduate courses include work placements in local authorities, private consultancy firms, or governmental bodies.

2. Entry-Level Roles: Graduates can apply for positions such as assistant planners in local councils, environmental agencies, or private planning consultancies.

3. Voluntary Work and Networking: Engaging with professional organizations like the IPI, attending conferences, and joining planning forums can provide valuable networking opportunities.

Skills Required

Town planning requires a combination of technical and interpersonal skills, including:

• Analytical Thinking: Ability to assess spatial and environmental data to make informed decisions.

• Problem-Solving: Addressing urban development challenges effectively.

• Communication Skills: Engaging with stakeholders, writing reports, and presenting findings clearly.

• Knowledge of Planning Law and Policy: Understanding Irish planning legislation, local government structures, and EU environmental regulations.

• Project Management: Coordinating multiple projects and stakeholders efficiently.

Career Opportunities

Once qualified, town planners in Ireland can pursue various career paths, including:

• Public Sector: Working for local authorities, government departments, or regional planning offices.

• Private Sector: Employment in planning consultancies, real estate firms, or infrastructure companies.

• Academia and Research: Engaging in policy research or teaching at universities.

• Environmental and Community Development: Working with non-profit organizations focused on sustainability and social planning.

Conclusion

Becoming a town planner in Ireland requires a combination of academic qualifications, professional accreditation, and practical experience. By pursuing the necessary education, gaining hands-on experience, and developing key skills, individuals can contribute to the sustainable growth and development of Irish towns and cities. As urbanization continues to shape Ireland’s landscape, the role of town planners remains crucial in creating livable, functional, and environmentally sustainable communities.

Addressing disillusionment with the Irish planning system

 Disillusionment with the Irish Planning System

The Irish planning system has long been a subject of debate, scrutiny, and controversy. While designed to regulate development, balance economic growth with environmental sustainability, and cater to the needs of a growing population, it has increasingly become a source of frustration for many stakeholders, including policymakers, developers, environmentalists, and the general public. Disillusionment with the system stems from bureaucratic inefficiencies, political interference, environmental concerns, and the failure to provide adequate housing and infrastructure.

Bureaucratic Inefficiencies and Delays

One of the most common criticisms of the Irish planning system is its slow and cumbersome nature. Obtaining planning permission for developments, particularly large-scale projects, can be a lengthy process, often taking years due to administrative red tape and legal challenges. The involvement of multiple agencies and the complexity of planning regulations lead to excessive delays, discouraging investment and making it difficult to address urgent housing and infrastructure needs. Judicial reviews of planning decisions, often initiated by local opposition or environmental groups, further prolong the process, creating uncertainty and driving up costs for developers.

Political Influence and Corruption

The Irish planning system has historically been plagued by allegations of political interference and corruption. In the past, tribunals such as the Mahon Tribunal have exposed instances of improper influence in rezoning decisions and planning permissions. While reforms have been introduced to enhance transparency and accountability, concerns persist regarding the undue influence of vested interests in shaping planning policies. Political pressure often results in inconsistent decision-making, undermining public confidence in the fairness and integrity of the system.

Failure to Address Housing Needs

Ireland is currently experiencing a severe housing crisis, with demand significantly outstripping supply. The planning system has been widely criticized for failing to facilitate the timely and sufficient delivery of housing, particularly affordable and social housing. Lengthy approval processes, restrictive zoning laws, and local opposition to high-density developments have contributed to the shortage. Moreover, large tracts of land remain underutilized due to speculative land hoarding, exacerbating the problem. The government's attempts to introduce fast-track planning measures, such as the Strategic Housing Development (SHD) process, have met with mixed results, with many projects being delayed or rejected due to legal challenges.

Environmental and Sustainability Concerns

The planning system has also struggled to balance development with environmental sustainability. Ireland's commitments to climate action and biodiversity protection often clash with economic and infrastructural ambitions. Large-scale projects, such as data centres and road expansions, have been criticized for their environmental impact, particularly in terms of carbon emissions and habitat destruction. At the same time, renewable energy projects, such as wind farms, frequently encounter planning obstacles due to local opposition and regulatory complexity. The inability to implement a cohesive, forward-thinking strategy for sustainable development has contributed to growing public frustration.

Public Distrust and Legal Challenges

The increasing number of legal challenges to planning decisions highlights the growing public dissatisfaction with the system. Communities often feel excluded from meaningful participation in planning processes, leading to opposition movements against certain developments. The perception that developers and government bodies prioritize profit over community welfare has fueled distrust, prompting frequent judicial reviews and appeals. While public engagement is a crucial aspect of democratic planning, the adversarial nature of these challenges has resulted in gridlock, preventing necessary projects from progressing efficiently.

Potential Reforms and the Way Forward

To restore public trust and improve efficiency, significant reforms are needed within the Irish planning system. Streamlining approval processes, reducing bureaucratic hurdles, and enhancing transparency in decision-making could help address delays and inefficiencies. Greater emphasis on sustainable development, backed by clear, enforceable policies, is necessary to align planning with environmental and climate goals. Additionally, improved public engagement mechanisms could foster a more inclusive planning process, ensuring that community concerns are addressed without unduly hindering progress.

In conclusion, disillusionment with the Irish planning system is rooted in a combination of inefficiencies, political influences, housing shortages, environmental conflicts, and public distrust. While reforms have been attempted, significant challenges remain in achieving a balance between development, sustainability, and public interest. Without meaningful and effective change, frustration with the system will likely persist, further exacerbating Ireland's social and economic challenges.

Addressing derelict buildings in Dublin

 Addressing derelict buildings in Dublin is a multifaceted challenge that requires coordinated efforts from local authorities, property owners, and the community. Derelict properties not only mar the city's aesthetic appeal but also represent missed opportunities, especially amid a housing crisis.

Understanding the Issue

A derelict site, as defined by the Derelict Sites Act 1990, is any land that detracts significantly from the amenity, character, or appearance of its neighborhood due to:

• Structures in ruinous, derelict, or dangerous conditions
• Neglected or unsightly land or structures
• Accumulation of litter, rubbish, debris, or waste

Local authorities are mandated to maintain a Derelict Sites Register, documenting such properties and their owners. Inclusion in this register can lead to enforcement actions and financial levies.

Current Landscape in Dublin

Recent reports highlight a concerning number of derelict properties in Dublin's city center, even as the city grapples with a housing shortage. Notable examples include the former Coláiste Mhuire on Parnell Square and other unused buildings on the northside, which remain unoccupied despite the pressing need for housing.

Strategies for Addressing Dereliction

1. Enforcement of Existing Legislation: Local authorities should rigorously apply the provisions of the Derelict Sites Act. This includes prosecuting non-compliant owners, executing compulsory land purchases, and undertaking necessary remedial work, with costs charged to the owners.

2. Financial Incentives and Penalties: Properties listed on the Derelict Sites Register are subject to a levy, currently set at 7% of the site's market value. This financial obligation serves as a deterrent against neglect and encourages owners to maintain their properties.

3. Community Engagement and Reporting: Residents play a crucial role in identifying and reporting derelict sites. Dublin City Council provides channels for the public to report neglected buildings, enabling timely interventions.

4. Adaptive Reuse and Redevelopment: Transforming derelict buildings into functional spaces can address housing shortages and revitalize communities. For instance, architects Gráinne Dunne and Nicola Ryan converted a derelict factory in Chapelizod into co-housing units tailored to their families' needs, showcasing how innovative design can repurpose neglected spaces.

5. Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborations between the government and private sector can mobilize resources for large-scale redevelopment projects. Such partnerships can expedite the transformation of derelict sites into viable residential or commercial properties.

Challenges and Considerations

While the framework to tackle dereliction exists, several challenges persist:

• Ownership Complexities: Determining and contacting the rightful owners of derelict properties can be a protracted process, delaying remedial actions.

• Resource Limitations: Local authorities may face budgetary and staffing constraints, hindering their ability to monitor and address all derelict sites effectively.

• Economic Factors: Property owners might lack the financial means to renovate or sell derelict buildings, leading to prolonged neglect.

Conclusion

Addressing derelict buildings in Dublin requires a comprehensive approach that combines strict enforcement of existing laws, financial incentives, community involvement, and innovative redevelopment strategies. By transforming neglected properties into valuable assets, Dublin can enhance its urban landscape, alleviate housing pressures, and foster a sense of civic pride among its residents.