Sunday, 1 November 2026

Planner's Take, 1 November 2026

This is an editorial from BPS Planning, issued for discussion only.

There are documents in Irish public life that age gracefully, and there are documents that simply age. The Wind Energy Development Guidelines, published in 2006, belong firmly to the second category. They were written for a country with far fewer turbines, and far smaller ones, before the present climate targets and before machines of the heights now routinely proposed. Twenty years on they remain the guidance to which An Coimisiún Pleanála and every council must have regard when deciding whether a wind farm should be built, and on Friday the Supreme Court reminded us, in the most courteous possible way, exactly what that phrase does and does not mean.

The case concerned seven EDF Renewables turbines at Killeshin Hills and neighbouring townlands in Co Carlow. Two local residents, one of them a farmer living less than a kilometre from the site, and a residents' environmental group had challenged the Commission's permission, arguing in essence that the separation distances between the turbines did not meet the guidelines. The High Court dismissed the challenge last May and refused leave to go to the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court has now declined to hear a direct appeal, finding that the case did not meet the constitutional threshold of general public importance or the interests of justice. Its central observation was a simple one: the inspector and the Commission were obliged only to have regard to the guidelines, which they clearly did.

That is a correct statement of the law, and it is worth dwelling on, because a good deal of public argument about wind energy proceeds as though the 2006 document were a statute with numbered rules that a developer either meets or breaks. It is not. Guidance of this kind informs judgement; it does not replace it. A decision-maker who reads it, weighs it and explains why a particular layout is acceptable has done what the law asks, even where a neighbour reads the same paragraphs and reaches a different view. Courts in judicial review are concerned with whether a decision was lawfully made, not with whether the judge would have made it, and the Carlow ruling is a clean illustration of that discipline.

But a legally sound decision made under stale guidance is not quite the same thing as a sound system. The Department of Housing published draft revised guidelines in December 2019, and they were never finalised. The 2024 Planning and Development Act has since introduced National Planning Statements to replace ministerial guidelines, and in a written Dáil reply in October the Minister said that a statement on onshore wind is being prepared with the climate department, that the highly technical work on noise is now substantially complete, and that a strategic environmental assessment and public consultation will follow. No date has been given. In the meantime, he confirmed, the 2006 guidelines remain in force.

The scale of what is coming makes the delay harder to defend. In the same week as the Carlow judgment, an application for the Slievegrine Renewable Energy Development, twenty-three turbines with tip heights of 170 to 185 metres between Dungarvan and Youghal, went directly to the Commission as strategic infrastructure, with a decision expected by October 2027. Projects of that size will be assessed against guidance drafted for a quite different generation of machines, and everyone involved, the developer, the Commission, the council making its submission and the families living in those townlands, would be better served by rules that plainly fit the thing being proposed.

There is a respectable counter-argument, and it should be heard. Guidance written in haste can be worse than old guidance applied with care, and the Commission and its inspectors have developed a substantial body of practice on noise, shadow flicker and setback through two decades of casework. The environmental assessment and consultation the Minister describes are not bureaucratic ornaments; they are requirements of European law, and a statement rushed past them would invite exactly the kind of litigation everyone says they want to avoid.

Even so, the conclusion seems hard to escape. The Carlow decision shows that the courts will uphold a decision properly reasoned under the existing guidelines, and that is a reassurance to applicants. It offers rather less to communities, who are entitled to know that the standards applied to a turbine outside their window were written with turbines of that size in mind. A clear, current and properly assessed national statement would serve both, and would allow the argument about wind energy to be conducted on the merits of individual sites rather than on the age of the rulebook.

Irish Town Planner Planning News Roundup, 1 November 2026

Here is today's round-up of town planning news from around Ireland, covering mounting criticism of recent changes to social housing delivery, signs that housing output may be turning a corner, a Supreme Court refusal to hear an appeal over Carlow wind turbines, a developer's appeal against a rival's Ballincollig scheme, a 23-turbine application in west Waterford, 59 homes proposed in Tullow and a revised graveyard extension plan in Waterford city.

Pressure grows on Housing Minister over turnkey and housing body changes

Housing charities, approved housing bodies and economists have publicly criticised Minister for Housing James Browne over plans to sharply reduce the number of new homes bought by councils and housing bodies, with builders arguing that many private schemes depend on those sales to get finance and that councils' planning departments will need heavy investment to design projects themselves. The Department of Housing has denied reports that housing bodies were told to cap delivery at 5,000 homes a year, and the Minister is due to meet the Housing Alliance. Sinn Féin's Eoin Ó Broin has called the official denials disingenuous, according to the Irish Independent.

Source: The Journal (1 November 2026)

Five signs the housing crisis may be turning a corner

RTÉ's economics editor notes that completions between July and September were up 10.4 per cent on last year, with almost 27,000 homes finished so far in 2026 and analysts expecting 39,000 to 40,000 by year end, compared with 36,000 in 2025. First-time buyer mortgages are up 9 per cent, listings on MyHome rose 12.5 per cent in September, and annual price growth has slowed from about 10 per cent to 5 per cent. Output nonetheless remains well short of the 50,000 to 60,000 homes a year said to be needed, and Goodbody's Dermot O'Leary calls for faster rezoning of residential land, coordinated utility connections and further planning reform.

Source: RTÉ News (31 October 2026)

Supreme Court refuses appeal over Carlow wind turbines

The Supreme Court has refused leave for a direct appeal by two local residents and the Rural Residents Wind Aware and Environmental Group against An Coimisiún Pleanála's permission for seven EDF Renewables turbines at Killeshin Hills and neighbouring townlands in Co Carlow, after the High Court dismissed their challenge in May. The objectors had argued that the separation distances between turbines did not comply with the 2006 Wind Energy Development Guidelines. The court found the High Court had not misapplied the guidelines, observing that the Commission was only required to have regard to them, which it clearly did.

Source: The Irish Times (30 October 2026)

O'Flynn Group appeals rival's 300-home scheme

The Business Post reports that O'Flynn Group has appealed to An Coimisiún Pleanála against a 300-home development by a rival developer and has complained about its treatment by the council. Cork City Council granted MOS Homes permission in September for 300 homes at Carriganarra and Carrigrohane in Ballincollig, over an objection from O'Flynn Construction, whose own plan for 1,150 homes at nearby Maglin was refused in August pending delivery of the South Ballincollig transport corridor and is also under appeal.

Source: Business Post (31 October 2026)

23-turbine Slievegrine wind farm lodged as strategic infrastructure

Slievegrine Ltd has applied directly to An Coimisiún Pleanála for the Slievegrine Renewable Energy Development, 23 wind turbines with tip heights of 170 to 185 metres across townlands between Dungarvan and Youghal, Co Waterford. The proposal also includes a 110kV substation, a 220kV loop-in substation and an underground 220kV connection to the existing Knockraha to Cullenagh line. As a strategic infrastructure development, the decision rests with the Commission, with Waterford City and County Council invited to make a submission, and a decision is expected by October 2027.

Source: Waterford Live (29 October 2026)

59 homes proposed off the Rathoe Road, Tullow

Tidefall Limited has applied to Carlow County Council for 59 homes off the Rathoe Road in Tullow, on a site identified as Phase 2 at Cuanahowan, with access through the existing Cuanahowan estate. The plans include car parking, bin storage, open space and landscaping. The application was at pre-validation stage, and a decision is due by 17 December.

Source: Carlow Live (30 October 2026)

Revised plan lodged for Ballygunner cemetery extension

The Parish of St Joseph, St Benildus and St Mary's has lodged a fresh application to extend St Mary's Cemetery at Ballygunner, Waterford city, this time to the east of the existing graveyard, with new internal roads, paths and car parking. An earlier proposal from January 2025 to extend the cemetery to the south was refused by Waterford City and County Council over ground conditions, traffic and land zoning.

Source: Waterford Live (30 October 2026)

Saturday, 31 October 2026

Planner's Take, 31 October 2026

This is an editorial article from BPS Planning, issued for discussion only.

There is a particular kind of planning document that nobody outside the profession ever reads and almost everybody inside it has written: the environmental impact assessment screening report. It runs to dozens of pages, costs real money, and in the overwhelming majority of ordinary housing schemes it concludes, after a careful march through soils, water, biodiversity, traffic and cultural heritage, that a full assessment is not required. The Department of Housing has now published draft regulations under which housing schemes of up to 250 homes would no longer need formal screening at all, and it is worth asking, calmly and without slogans, what is actually being given up and what is being gained.

What officials have taken to calling a traffic light system would work like this. Up to 250 units is green, and no formal screening is needed; between 250 and 750 is amber, and the scheme is screened; above 750 is red, and a full assessment is mandatory. Easy to miss is that the point at which assessment becomes compulsory, 500 homes for more than twenty years, would rise by half. Similar exclusion thresholds are proposed for overhead electricity lines, private roads and wastewater treatment plants below 10,000 population equivalent, which should help Uisce Éireann with the unglamorous upgrades so many towns are waiting on. None of it applies until Part 4 of the Planning and Development Act 2024 is commenced, which awaits the end of the council work-to-rule.

What most of the coverage has skated past is that green does not mean unexamined. Section 225 of the 2024 Act requires the council, for any scheme below an exclusion threshold, to examine its nature and location and to move to screening if the possibility of significant effects cannot be excluded. What disappears is the obligation on the developer to commission and submit the formal screening material, not the obligation on the State to look.

The Government's case is that this removes duplication. Minister of State John Cummins argues that environmental screening already happens when land is zoned, and that the lack of exclusion thresholds meant everything was being screened. The second claim is fair in practice, if not quite in law: the 2001 Regulations already required only a preliminary examination below the 500-unit line, but many applicants, knowing where judicial reviews are won and lost, have long submitted full screening reports as a matter of course. A study published with the Department's consultation found that fewer than one per cent of schemes below 250 homes ended up with a full assessment. Engineers Ireland, the Chartered Institute of Building and Cork Chamber all supported exclusion thresholds in the consultation, though the engineers wanted sensitive locations and cumulative effects still covered and the builders' institute wanted councils resourced to do the work. Sean O'Driscoll of the Accelerating Infrastructure Taskforce has compared Ireland's 2022 tally with 217 in Germany and eight in Denmark, though the Irish figure has been reported as both 257 assessments and 237 screenings, which is not a small difference in a debate about precision.

The objections deserve the same seriousness. Eoin Ó Broin of Sinn Féin spoke of a sense of déjà vu about light-touch regulation, and the Green Party's Malcolm Noonan has warned that flood plains, hedgerows and archaeology could be overlooked. Here the law is not on anyone's side so much as on its own. Zoning-stage assessment under the SEA Directive is expressly without prejudice to project assessment, and the European Court of Justice has held, against Ireland itself over peat extraction and land reclamation, that a threshold based on size alone, blind to nature and location, exceeds what the Directive permits. More recently it found Vienna's urban development thresholds set so high that most projects were excluded in advance. The new examination is what keeps the Irish system on the right side of that line, which is why it cannot be allowed to become a formality. Appropriate assessment under the Habitats Directive, the regime behind so many recent challenges, is untouched, and every scheme must still be screened for it.

My view is that the change is sensible in principle, and that its legality and its value rest on one thing: a nature and location examination done properly, by councils with the ecologists and resources to do it. If that happens, few outside the consultancies will mourn the routine screening report. If it does not, the time saved at the front of the process will be lost again at the back, in the courts, where Irish housing has already spent too much of the last decade.

Irish Town Planner Planning News Roundup, 31 October 2026

Here is today's round-up of town planning news from around Ireland, covering draft rules to exempt housing schemes of up to 250 homes from environmental screening, confirmation that the levy and water connection waiver ends this year, a refusal on density grounds at St Ann's Hill in Cork, 30 homes refused in Longford over wastewater capacity, an appeal over apartments in Castlebar and the delayed rural housing planning statement.

Draft rules would exempt schemes of up to 250 homes from EIA screening

The Department of Housing has published draft regulations under which housing developments of up to 250 units would no longer need environmental impact assessment screening, schemes of 250 to 750 units would be screened and a full assessment would be required above 750 units. Exclusion thresholds are also proposed for overhead electricity lines, private roads and wastewater treatment plants serving fewer than 10,000 population equivalent. The changes will take effect with the commencement of Part 4 of the Planning and Development Act 2024, which is not expected until the work-to-rule by council staff ends.

Source: RTÉ News (30 October 2026)

Minister rules out extending development levy and water connection waiver

Minister for Housing James Browne has said the waiver on development levies and Uisce Éireann connection charges, introduced in 2024, will not be extended beyond the end of December, so only homes finished by the end of 2026 will benefit. His comments followed Central Statistics Office figures showing 26,833 homes completed between January and September, compared with 24,256 in the same period last year. Opposition parties point out that the Government's suggested figure of about 40,000 homes this year remains well short of the 50,000 a year backed by the Housing Commission.

Source: RTÉ News (30 October 2026)

80 homes at former Hydro site in Tower refused over low density

An Coimisiún Pleanála has refused permission to OMD(C) Ltd for 55 houses and 25 apartments on the 11-hectare site of the former St Ann's Hydropathic Establishment at St Ann's Hill, Tower, Co Cork, overturning Cork City Council's June grant and its own inspector's recommendation. The scheme's density of 17.3 dwellings per hectare compared with a development plan minimum of 35 per hectare, and the Commission found the site's archaeological and heritage constraints did not justify such a departure. It concluded the scheme would be an inefficient and unsustainable use of zoned, serviced land.

Source: Irish Examiner (30 October 2026)

30 homes refused at Stonepark, Longford, over wastewater concerns

Longford County Council has refused permission for 30 homes, 24 three-bedroom and six two-bedroom houses, near the Silver Birches estate at Stonepark, Longford. Uisce Éireann and seven other parties made submissions, and local residents raised concerns that the existing sewage treatment plant serving the estate was already at capacity, along with water pressure, surface water and traffic issues. The decision was made on 20 October after further information was received in September.

Source: Longford Live (28 October 2026)

Castlebar Coal Bunker apartments refusal appealed

Developer Harold Conway has appealed Mayo County Council's refusal of permission for 12 apartments at the former Coal Bunker site at the junction of the Pontoon and Turlough roads in Castlebar, opposite the Sacred Heart Hospital. It is the council's second refusal on the site, following an earlier proposal for 19 units, and it found that residential use would materially contravene the site's Enterprise and Employment zoning in the Castlebar Town and Environs Local Area Plan. A decision on the appeal is due before the end of February.

Source: Connaught Telegraph (30 October 2026)

No date yet for new rural housing planning rules

The Department of Housing has confirmed that the draft Sustainable Rural and Gaeltacht Housing National Planning Statement, whose policy direction the Government agreed on 30 June, is still undergoing environmental assessment and has yet to go to public consultation. The statement is expected to address issues such as ribbon and backland development and local-needs criteria, and councils will have to review their development plans where they are significantly inconsistent with it. No date has been given for consultation, final Government approval or implementation.

Source: Selfbuild (30 October 2026)

Friday, 30 October 2026

Irish Planning History: Saving Dublin

There is a particular kind of Irish book that is written in a rage and read as a relief, and Frank McDonald's The Destruction of Dublin, which we looked at here last week, was one of them. McDonald himself, looking back in a 2008 Irish Times essay on the 1980s, confessed as much, admitting that he simply could not understand why the city was being treated by developers as a quarry and by road engineers as an inconvenience to traffic. But rage, however well documented, is not a policy, and the more interesting question for anyone who works in planning now is what came after the anger: how a city that one former Lord Mayor, the late Jim Mitchell, had likened to a knacker's yard managed, within a generation, to persuade people that it was a place worth living in again.

McDonald's own answer came four years after the first book, in Saving the City: How to Halt the Destruction of Dublin, published by Tomar in 1989 with, of all things, an introduction by Bob Geldof. The title is worth pausing on, because it marks a shift in register from lament to prescription, from the charge sheet to the to-do list, and that shift was happening not only in one journalist's head but across a whole loose coalition of citizens, students, clerics, senators and, eventually, ministers.

This piece was always going to lean heavily on McDonald, and it is hard to write it without noting that he is no longer here to quarrel with it. He died in September, after a short illness, at the age of 76, and The Irish Times, reporting his death, recalled that he had become the paper's first environment correspondent in 1986 on the back of his investigations into planning failures and dereliction in Dublin. It was a sad day for the city, and for anyone who cares about what becomes of it, whichever side of a planning appeal they happen to sit on.

A weekend in the Synod Hall

If the change of mood has a date, it is the weekend of 7 to 9 February 1986, when the Dublin Crisis Conference filled the old Synod Hall at Christchurch Place. McDonald, writing about it thirty years later, named the organisers as Dean Victor Griffin, Senator David Norris, Larry Dillon, Deirdre Kelly, Mick Rafferty, Donal Storey and himself, a list that tells you something in itself, running as it does from the Dean of St Patrick's to a north inner city community activist. They even got the Taoiseach, Garret FitzGerald, to turn up and respond to their conclusions, the principal one being a demand that the Government and the Dublin local authorities "recognise and accept that the city is in crisis".

It is easy, at this distance, to smile at a demand that amounts to asking officialdom to admit there is a problem, but anyone who has sat through a few council meetings will know that this is usually the hardest step of all. The conference asked for more than an admission, though. It called for the destructive road plans for the inner city to be abandoned, and for tax incentives to encourage people to live in the centre rather than merely to work in it. The papers, the conference report and a later Manifesto for the City survive in the Frank McDonald collection at Dublin City University, alongside a programme cover by Martyn Turner, which is about as Dublin as an archive gets.

The people problem

The real insight of the period, and the one that has aged best, was that buildings were never going to be saved by preservation orders alone. They would be saved, if at all, by people living in them. McDonald credited the late Deirdre Kelly, founder of the Living City Group, with driving this point home, and in his 2015 farewell piece he recalled that in 1986 regional planners saw no hope that the inner city could take even an extra 10,000 people. The idea Kelly pressed was not entirely home-grown. As McDonald noted in a 2018 Irish Times piece on the Leeson Street residents, drawing on the historian Erika Hanna, Kelly had been influenced by Jane Jacobs, whose The Death and Life of Great American Cities had argued in 1961 that city streets live by their mix of uses and the people on them, and who had helped to defeat Robert Moses's plan to drive a road through Washington Square in New York. Catriona Crowe, writing in The Dublin Review after Jacobs died in 2006, recalled first reading the book in the early 1980s in Mountjoy Square, just after one of the last clearances of Georgian tenements on Summerhill and Gardiner Street, which suggests the argument needed very little translation.

The numbers explain their pessimism. On McDonald's figures, the population of the inner city, the oval between the two canals, had fallen from about 250,000 in the mid-1920s to just 75,000 by 1991, so that only one Dubliner in twelve still lived in the historic core. Some of that decline was the welcome result of clearing the tenements and rehousing families in Marino, Crumlin and beyond, and it would be unfair to the public health reformers of the 1930s to pretend otherwise. But by the 1980s the drift had gone well past slum clearance into something closer to abandonment, with the centre treated as an office district ringed by ghettos, to borrow McDonald's own blunt phrase.

Tax, Temple Bar and the accidental village

The State's response was, characteristically, fiscal. Within months of the Synod Hall weekend the Government announced a tax incentive scheme for derelict areas, which, with the Urban Renewal Act 1986, brought the Custom House Docks and stretches of the quays into play. Planners have argued ever since about whether the property-based tax schemes that followed were a masterstroke or a mistake, and the honest answer is probably both: they got cranes moving where nothing else had, and they also produced a fair amount of the shoebox apartment, laid out along artificially lit corridors, that McDonald himself came to regret.

Temple Bar is the most instructive case, partly because it was saved by accident before it was saved by design. CIÉ had spent years from the 1970s quietly buying property between Dame Street and the Liffey for a central bus station, and, as Dublin City Council's archive notes, it let those buildings out cheaply in the meantime, which drew in artists, musicians and small traders who then became the most effective opponents of the bus station. Charles Haughey, never a man to leave a cultural flagship unclaimed, declared in 1987 that he wouldn't let CIÉ near the place. By February 1991 he was telling the Dáil that a new company, Temple Bar Properties, would acquire the CIÉ and Corporation holdings as a flagship project for Dublin's year as European City of Culture, and the Temple Bar Area Renewal and Development Act followed that summer.

What happened next is a lesson every regeneration agency should keep pinned above its desk. The cultural quarter that was meant to rival Covent Garden became, in McDonald's own words, "the temple of bars". None of that cancels out the new squares, the restored streets or the cultural buildings, but it does show how hard it is to plan for the bohemian life that had grown up there precisely because nobody was planning anything at all.

From protest to practice

The 1990s brought a quieter but in some ways more durable kind of saving. Dublin Civic Trust was founded in 1992 to show, by buying and repairing buildings, that old houses could be lived in and made to pay their way. Dublin Corporation, for its part, began to lead by example, and a Trinity College Dublin study of urban conservation in Dublin points to the Corporation's "Living Over the Shop" pilot at Nos. 2 and 3 Capel Street, two eighteenth-century buildings it owned, as the moment the local authority began to take a leadership role in conservation. The same study is a useful corrective to any rosy account of the decade, recording that conservationists were still going to court, and to Europe, over schemes they believed were wrong, and that some felt cooperation alone would never have been enough.

The legal turning point came with the Local Government (Planning and Development) Act 1999, which, as McDonald noted, meant Ireland belatedly adopted preservation laws comparable to the rest of Europe, though without the generous funding that usually goes with them. In the same year, Archer's Garage on Fenian Street, a rare art deco building, was illegally demolished over the June bank holiday weekend and had to be rebuilt more or less in facsimile, which was, whatever one thinks of facsimiles, a sign that the old impunity was ending.

What saving actually meant

The results can be counted. McDonald's figures have the inner city population, including the docklands, rising to more than 130,000 by 2011, and Dame Street, which he remembered as a dark thoroughfare enlivened only by the Olympia, is now lined with restaurants and shops that hardly close. Much of the agenda set in the Synod Hall, from repopulating the centre to recasting the road plans and giving more space to buses, bicycles and people on foot, has become ordinary public policy, so ordinary that younger planners may not realise it was ever heresy.

And yet it would be a strange history of Dublin that ended on a note of triumph. By 2016 McDonald was writing that the city was in crisis again, this time a crisis of homelessness, rents and sprawl rather than dereliction, and wondering aloud whether another Crisis Conference was needed. Aldborough House, the last of the great Georgian mansions, was still rotting on Portland Row when he retired, and the fire regulations that make it so hard to put homes over shops remain, as he put it, a serious impediment.

For a planner, whether acting for a developer or a residents' association, the lesson of the saving years is not that the campaigners were always right or the officials always wrong. It is that cities are saved by people choosing to live in them, by the rules that make that possible, and by the slow, unglamorous work of repairing what is there before reaching for the bulldozer. That argument was made in a church hall forty years ago, and the vacancy and dereliction debates of 2026 suggest it has not quite finished being made.

Further reading

Saving the City: How to Halt the Destruction of Dublin, by Frank McDonald (Tomar, 1989)
The Construction of Dublin, by Frank McDonald (Gandon, 2000)
The evolution of urban conservation in Ireland: evidence from Dublin city, Trinity College Dublin research archive: http://hdl.handle.net/2262/67653
The Frank McDonald collection, Dublin City University Library: https://artsandculture.google.com/story/frank-mcdonald-collection-dublin-city-university-libraries/JQUhSErgYWxr5w?hl=en
The Death and Life of Great American Cities, by Jane Jacobs (Random House, 1961)

Planners Take, 30 October 2026

Every Irish town has one: the house with the buddleia growing out of the gutter, the shopfront whose faded lettering advertises a business that closed before the euro arrived, the upstairs windows that have been dark for so long that nobody on the street can remember them lit. We have had a law to deal with such places since 1990, and a levy on their owners for most of that time, and yet the buildings remain, with a stubbornness that would be admirable if it were not so expensive for everybody else. This week a software engineer, Michael Gannon, did something that the State has been promising to do for years, which is to put the derelict sites registers kept by local authorities together in one place, on a website that lists more than 2,700 properties around the country.

The numbers he draws from that exercise are worth pausing over. By his estimate, these properties could be worth something over €500 million if they were developed for housing, and their owners owe in the region of €49.5 million in unpaid derelict sites levies. In 64 cases, he reckons, the owner owes more than the property is worth. One does not have to accept every valuation to see the shape of the problem. The levy, at 7 per cent of market value a year, was meant to make holding a derelict building more costly than doing something with it. In practice, it has too often been a bill that was issued, or not issued, and then quietly left to accumulate.

The Government's response, being carried through the Finance Act, is to hand collection of the levy to the Revenue Commissioners. From January, local authorities will be legally obliged to keep a derelict sites list and to send it to Revenue, and owners will have until the middle of 2028 to settle what they owe. A national digital register, with maps and standard details for each property, is to be published annually. It is hard to read this as anything other than a polite expression of frustration with councils, and it is a reasonable one, but it is only half the story.

Anyone who has worked in a planning department knows why derelict sites registers are patchy. Entering a property on the register is a legal process, with notices, objections and the possibility of challenge, and it falls to small teams who are also dealing with unauthorised development, vacant site levies and the ordinary daily traffic of complaints. Ownership is frequently tangled in probate, in family disagreement, or in companies that exist mainly on paper. Collection was harder still, because a council chasing a local owner for a levy is a council chasing a ratepayer and a voter. Moving collection to Revenue removes some of that awkwardness, but it does not remove the need for a council to identify, inspect and formally list the property in the first place, and the new regime will only be as complete as the registers that feed it.

There is also a fair point to be made on the other side. Not every owner of a derelict building is a speculator sitting on a windfall. Some are elderly people who inherited a property they cannot afford to repair; some are waiting on a planning permission, a fire certificate or a builder who never arrives. The State has been more generous here than it is sometimes given credit for: the vacant property refurbishment grant offers up to €70,000 to bring a single property back into use, and investors converting space over shops can now receive up to €135,000. A tougher levy makes sense precisely because the carrot is already on the table.

For planners, the lesson is that dereliction is a land management problem before it is a design problem. A public register is a useful thing in itself, because it lets communities, councillors and would-be buyers see what is sitting idle, and visibility has a way of concentrating minds. But the real test will come in 2028, when we see whether the levies are actually paid, whether properties change hands, and whether the dark windows on our main streets begin, one by one, to light up again. If they do not, the next step will have to be a more confident use of compulsory purchase, and a willingness by local authorities to take on buildings themselves rather than simply recording their decline.

Irish Town Planner Planning News Roundup, 30 October 2026

Here is today's round-up of town planning news from around Ireland, covering a High Court order reviving a 300-home Fermoy scheme, a large Land Development Agency land purchase in Dublin 15 and Meath, 124 apartments approved on appeal at Dunboyne, a new national website of derelict properties, 34 homes for Ballyhaise and a fresh DAA application at Dublin Airport.

High Court quashes refusal of 300-home Fermoy scheme

The High Court has quashed, with the consent of both sides, An Coimisiún Pleanála's September 2025 refusal of permission to Cumnor Construction Limited for 242 houses, 94 apartments and duplexes and a crèche on an 11.75-hectare site at Coolcarron, about 1km from Fermoy, Co Cork. The scheme, lodged as a strategic housing development in April 2022, had been refused because it did not provide the playing pitches required by the local area plan. The application has now been reactivated on the Commission's website, with a fresh decision due by late February 2027.

Source, Irish Examiner, 29 October 2026: https://www.irishexaminer.com/business/companies/arid-41930553.html

LDA buys land for about 3,000 homes at Kilmartin and Calliaghwee

The Land Development Agency has acquired 108.5 hectares of greenfield land at Kilmartin, Dublin 15, and Calliaghwee, Co Meath, with about 85.7 hectares in Fingal and 22.8 hectares in Meath, close to bus services and the Dunboyne commuter rail line. Initial studies suggest the lands could accommodate around 3,000 homes along with commercial space and community amenities. The agency notes that any development will be subject to rezoning, masterplanning, infrastructure provision, environmental assessment and statutory planning approval.

Source, Land Development Agency, 29 October 2026: https://lda.ie/news/land-3000-new-homes

124 apartments granted on appeal at Dunboyne North

An Coimisiún Pleanála has granted permission, subject to five revised conditions, to Marina Quarter Ltd, a Glenveagh Homes subsidiary, for 124 apartments in three four- and five-storey blocks at Bennetstown, south of the M3 Parkway rail station in Dunboyne North, Co Meath. The scheme replaces 76 apartments previously permitted there, and Meath County Council's grant in July had been appealed by neighbours who raised overshadowing, privacy and infrastructure concerns while saying they did not oppose new housing. The Commission's decision is dated 22 October.

Source, Irish Independent, 30 October 2026: https://www.independent.ie/county/meath/an-coimisiun-pleanala-grants-green-light-for-124-apartments-in-meath-following-appeal/a/163441734.html

New website lists 2,700 derelict properties

A new website, derelictproperties.ie, built by software engineer Michael Gannon from local authority derelict sites registers, lists more than 2,700 properties, which he estimates could be worth over €500 million if developed for housing and whose owners owe about €49.5 million in levies. From January, councils will be legally required to keep a derelict sites list and send it to the Revenue Commissioners, who will take over collection of the 7 per cent annual levy, with owners given until mid-2028 to pay arrears. The Government also plans to publish an annual national digital register of derelict sites.

Source, The Irish Times, 30 October 2026: https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/housing-planning/2026/10/30/new-derelict-buildings-website-lists-2700-residential-properties-countrywide/

34 homes approved at Ballyhaise, Co Cavan

Cavan County Council has granted permission, subject to 25 conditions, to Woodfort Homes Ltd for a €10 million development of 34 homes on a four-acre site at Townparks, Ballyhaise, accessed from Oakwood Lane off the R212. The scheme comprises 21 two-bedroom homes, 12 three-bedroom homes and one four-bedroom home, with 75 car parking spaces. Separate applications for 61 homes at Latt and 36 at Creighan, on the outskirts of Cavan town, were lodged last week.

Source, Irish Independent, 30 October 2026: https://www.independent.ie/county/cavan/cavans-building-boom-continues-apace-as-dublin-construction-firm-given-green-light-for-multi-million-euro-housing-development/a/163778330.html

DAA seeks changes to Dublin Airport US pre-clearance upgrade

DAA has lodged a new planning application to amend the upgrade of the US Customs and Border Protection pre-clearance facility at Dublin Airport that An Coimisiún Pleanála approved in May 2025, including an additional storey. Its consultants say constraints emerged from stakeholder engagement, updated passenger modelling and revised US requirements, and that the changes are not intended to facilitate passenger growth but to provide more queuing and waiting space, easier way-finding and more commercial areas.

Source, The Irish Times, 29 October 2026: https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2026/10/29/daa-returns-to-planners-with-upgrade-to-agreed-us-pre-clearance-area-revamp/