In my view, two of today's stories touch on the same tension: certainty versus caution.
An Coimisiún Pleanála's 2025 annual report, as covered by the Irish Examiner (https://www.irishexaminer.com/business/economy/arid-41926517.html) and the Irish Independent (https://www.independent.ie/business/irish-business/planning-body-flags-rise-in-legal-challenges-to-infrastructure-projects/a/163354535.html), is broadly encouraging. The backlog is down and more than 60% of cases were decided on time, up from a quarter the year before. But 143 judicial reviews, almost €12 million in legal costs and challenges to nearly every major Dublin transport project are a reminder that a quick decision is not the same as a secure one. For applicants, the lesson remains to build a robust record at application stage, particularly on environmental assessment, because that is where challenges tend to land.
The Dunsink debate in Fingal, reported by the Dublin Inquirer (https://www.dublininquirer.com/in-marathon-meetings-fingal-councillors-seek-to-fine-tune-plans-for-new-town-in-dunsink/), shows the other side. Councillors are right to want transport in place before thousands of people move in. Yet tying later phases to a Luas line the council does not control, and which the National Transport Authority lists as post-2042, risks a plan that stalls after a first phase. A phasing trigger is only useful if someone is committed to meeting it. Firm funding commitments for interim bus and active travel links may be a more workable safeguard.
These are my own views, offered for discussion.
No comments:
Post a Comment